![]() ![]() ![]() Avenging AngelThursday 27th April 2000![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() THERE'S A WHEEZING of wingbeats as one of the Mute Swans gets airborne and flies low over the rushes to land heavily on a small patch of open water. The second swan swims around to join it, gliding along with its wings arched, stately as a galleon. They greet each other, wings-raised and arching their necks, turning their heads, so that, from our viewpoint, they form a heart shape. They then turn to feed in synchronised display, dipping their heads together. This rushy field, by the way, is earmarked for sand and gravel extraction on the local plan.
On the garden shed a pair of Dunnocks have been investigating the honeysuckle near the teapot in which the Robins nested last year.
Guardian of the Meadows![]() It's a strange coincidence, a story that really goes back ten years, but the last time the meadow came up for discussion at a planning meeting, last December, there was a terrific storm in the morning. A huge bough from an old Ash crashed down, blocking the path right at the entrance to the woods, at the corner of the meadow, and I wrote that its shattered, arching form looked 'like some guardian angel.' Now here's the archangel, in just the same place. Sadly it is growing ringed in behind the builder's mesh-grid fence.
As preparations are made for a public execution in a little western town a woman turns to the 'Bad' character, 'Angel Eyes' (Lee Van Cleef) and says; 'That man (the 'Ugly' Eli Wallach) is the Devil incarnate. He deserves to hang.' 'Angel Eyes' smiles slyly and looks towards the livery stables; 'Just because you put a rope around a man's neck, it doesn't mean you're going to hang him. That 'devil' has a guardian angel, a blonde-haired guardian angel.' So I'd like to say; 'Just because you put a fence around a meadow it doesn't mean you're going to build on it. That meadow has a guardian angel, a Yellow Archangel.' I'm afraid that, for us, Clint Eastwood isn't going to ride in, guns blazing, to save the day, but I am now approaching central government, to ask that the practice of threatening witnesses with financial annihilation immediately before they start give their evidence at a public enquiry (as happened to me) should be stopped. Amazingly, as far as I can discover from the local authority, the Department of the Environment and the Regional Government Office, this practice is sanctioned under current legislation, not just here in Wild West Yorkshire, but throughout England. 'I must advise,' writes a Council spokesman, 'that Circular 8/93 . . . represents current government policy.'
It makes me sad and indignant to see what is going on, but, until we can get a change in the law, it is simply too risky for ordinary people to oppose such plans. You could risk loosing everything. I'm sorry to sound like such a coward, but this is real life, not the movies. At the enquiry it was made plain to us that the possible total of costs for a two day enquiry at our local Town Hall could be up to £240,000 (about equal to what I've earned in the past fifteen or twenty years). That's about £400 a minute. Three or four of us would have to sell our homes to raise that kind of amount. There's no way I would want to risk that again. On the day I attempted to give my evidence, but made a complete hash of it, I felt so terrified. When houses, hotels and factories get names like 'meadow', 'park' and 'wood' what names are we going to reserve for the real countryside? 'Leaf Production Unit' perhaps? I do apologise for going on about this matter, which greatly troubles me. I promise there'll be more natural history tomorrow!
![]() ![]() |